news
Beautiful Art
3 Hidden Cultural Yards
in Lithuania’s Top Cities.
future development
Hybrid+,
a new approach to meeting experiences launched by Göteborg & Co.
Hotel news
Scandic Hotels reports strong results
and cash flow for third quarter 2021.
business intelligence
China might reopen border
if vaccination target reached by early 2022: CDC chief.
Kellerman
Expo 2020 Sustainability Pavilion Will Show How Far We Have Come
Roger Kellerman on mindsets and skillsets for thriving while society and nature regenerate.
Rethink
New Rules of Engagement
A new tact is required: Here is how we think the return of face-to-face live events will look.
Destination Planning
Evolving the Role of Convention Bureaus
Staying relevant in a rapidly changing marketplace as well as in your respective destination.
Research
Business Event Management of the Future
Many associations were ready to pivot and move their events online.
Hybrid Events
Moving From Virtual to Hybrid Events
37 Tips and Ideas on How to Maximise Your Success.
RSS
rss_icon
Links
Denmark Ranks Among the Leading Innovative EU Member States

Denmark has maintained its point score in the European Commission’s annual innovation ranking, the Innovation Union Scoreboard. However, in 2013 Germany increased its number of points and is therefore now ahead of Denmark. Sweden still occupies the lead.

The Minister for Higher Education, Morten Østergaard, emphasizes that the ranking demonstrates the strength of the Danish innovation system, but also the need for improvement.

“I am very pleased with Denmark’s ranking on the European Commission’s annual Innovation Union Scoreboard. Despite the economic crises, Denmark has still achieved some of the highest numbers of points. However, we need to acknowledge that it is not enough to maintain our ranking. It is important we continue our ambitious innovation strategy,” said Morten Østergaard.

The annual Innovation Union Scoreboard provides a comparative assessment of the research and innovation performance of the EU27 Member States and the relative strengths and weaknesses of their research and innovation systems.